PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

Court rulingNovember 20, 2023Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. · N.D. Cal. 3:23-cv-03417

Kadrey v. Meta, 2023: judge dismisses every claim except the one for copying the authors' books to train LLaMA

Ruling on Meta's first motion to dismiss, Judge Chhabria left standing only the claim that Meta infringed by copying the plaintiffs' books to train LLaMA, which Meta had not moved to dismiss. He rejected the theory that the LLaMA models are themselves infringing derivative works, writing "This is nonsensical." He held that a claim based on the models' outputs requires an allegation that some output is similar to the plaintiffs' books, and the complaint had none. The DMCA claims failed because nothing alleged showed LLaMA distributed the books. The unfair competition, unjust enrichment and negligence claims were held preempted by the Copyright Act or inadequately pleaded. All dismissed claims except negligence were dismissed with leave to amend. The case later grew to include claims about how Meta acquired the books, including by torrent.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.