PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

Company filingAugust 1, 2024UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc. · D. Mass., No. 1:24-cv-11611-FDS

Suno's answer admits its training data includes essentially all reasonable-quality music files accessible on the open internet, and stakes its defense on fair use

Answering the record labels' June 24, 2024 complaint, Suno said on Aug. 1, 2024 that its model was built by showing a neural network tens of millions of recordings, essentially as many as can be located, many of which the labels control, so that its training data 'includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality' accessible on the open internet, while respecting paywalls and password protection. It said that whether UMG's particular version of Johnny B. Goode was in the data, many UMG recordings probably were. Suno argued that making intermediate copies to build a product whose outputs do not infringe is fair use, pointing to Google Books, Perfect 10 and the Sega and Oracle decisions, and that the labels' concession that they were not alleging the outputs themselves infringe would prove fatal to their claims. It also described guardrails that block prompts naming particular artists and audio-upload checks, and accused the labels of misusing the tool to generate the examples in their complaint. The labels later learned in discovery that the audio came from YouTube by stream-ripping, which became the subject of a DMCA claim added in 2026.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.