You’re signed up for e-mail updates.
Judge lets authors amend their complaint against Meta to add claims tied to its alleged torrenting of LibGen, and orders Meta to give testimony on seeding
Judge Chhabria granted the authors leave to file a third amended complaint. He found no undue delay, noting that an earlier reference to torrenting in the case had indicated Meta was not torrenting, and said Meta's arguments against the new claims were better heard on a motion to dismiss. The amended complaint alleges Meta downloaded millions of books from LibGen over BitTorrent, and adds a claim for removing copyright management information and a California computer-access claim. The judge also partly overruled the magistrate judge and ordered Meta to provide a company witness on seeding, meaning uploading to other users while torrenting. He wrote that such evidence could bear on willfulness or on Meta's fair use defense. Meta was also ordered to give two hours of testimony on its mitigation measures.
Loading the rest of the news…
What the labels mean
Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.
This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.