PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

Court orderSeptember 8, 2025Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC (Concord I) · N.D. Cal. 5:24-cv-03811

Magistrate judge orders Anthropic to give music publishers the text and metadata of its LibGen and PiLiMi datasets and the unredacted Bartz briefs

In the music publishers' first suit against Anthropic, the two sides disputed whether Anthropic had to produce documents about its use of BitTorrent to acquire books containing the publishers' lyrics. Magistrate Judge van Keulen ordered Anthropic to produce, by Sept. 11, 2025, the unredacted class certification and summary judgment briefs from Bartz v. Anthropic, and the raw text, extracted text and metadata from the LibGen and PiLiMi datasets. Anthropic also had to serve a verified supplemental answer to one interrogatory. The judge deferred the publishers' broader request for all documents about Anthropic's consideration or use of BitTorrent until the district judge ruled on their pending motion to add torrenting claims to the case.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.