PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

Court rulingNovember 11, 2025GEMA v. OpenAI (two OpenAI group companies) · Landgericht München I (Munich Regional Court I), 42 O 14139/24

Munich court rules that ChatGPT's memorization of nine German song lyrics in its models, and their reproduction in outputs, infringes copyright and is not covered by the text-and-data-mining exception

The Munich Regional Court I's copyright chamber ruled on Nov. 11, 2025 that GEMA, the German music collecting society, is entitled to injunctive relief, information and damages from two OpenAI companies over the lyrics of nine well-known German works, including Atemlos and Wie schoen, dass du geboren bist. A personality-rights claim over misattributed altered lyrics was dismissed. Per the court's press release, OpenAI argued its models store no specific training data, that users rather than OpenAI are responsible for outputs generated from prompts, and that any use was covered by the text-and-data-mining exception. The court found the lyrics were reproducibly contained in the GPT-4 and GPT-4o models, shown by comparing the lyrics in the training data with the outputs, with chance ruled out given their length; that this memorization is a reproduction under Section 16 UrhG and the InfoSoc Directive even though fixed in probability values; that the TDM exception in Section 44b UrhG covers preparatory copies made to assemble a training corpus but not reproduction of works inside the model; and that outputs from simple prompts are OpenAI's responsibility. The judgment is not final.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.