You’re signed up for e-mail updates.
OpenAI's answer to the book authors admits its books1 and books2 datasets included content from LibGen
In its answer to the authors' consolidated class action complaint, OpenAI admits that the datasets it called books1 and books2 "included content from LibGen" and that those datasets, or subsets of them, were used in training GPT-3 and GPT-3.5, which it describes as now deprecated. It denies the rest of the paragraph. The answer does not say how or when the LibGen content was obtained, or who obtained it, and it names no other book source. OpenAI's later answers to the news publishers in the same proceeding name Books1 and Books2 among the GPT-3 datasets without saying where they came from. Its defenses include fair use and license. This is OpenAI's own pleading; an admission in an answer responds to a specific allegation, and the complaint should be read alongside it.
Loading the rest of the news…
What the labels mean
Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.
This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.