You’re signed up for e-mail updates.
Judge finds OpenAI's corporate witness was not properly prepared, orders tens of millions more ChatGPT logs produced
Magistrate Judge Wang found that OpenAI's corporate designee "was not sufficiently or properly prepared" for his deposition, and that the pattern of objections and his answers impeded and delayed the examination. She ordered the parties to work out remedies, including more deposition time and production of non-privileged documents about an internal project on detecting copied text in outputs. She ordered OpenAI to produce two further collections of ChatGPT conversation logs, of 78 million and 10 million conversations, after steps to protect users' identities, and to produce a journal kept by OpenAI's president, subject to a privacy review. She noted that claims that OpenAI destroyed evidence would be briefed separately. The order arises from the news publishers' cases in the same consolidated proceeding as the authors' class action, and the authors also receive log productions under earlier orders.
Loading the rest of the news…
What the labels mean
Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.
This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.