PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

Court rulingApril 15, 2026Sony Music Entertainment v. Uncharted Labs, Inc. (Udio) · S.D.N.Y., No. 1:24-cv-04777-AKH (Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein)

Judge Hellerstein refuses to dismiss the record labels' DMCA claim that Udio circumvented YouTube's rolling cipher to stream-rip training audio

On April 15, 2026 Judge Hellerstein denied Udio's motion to dismiss the third cause of action in the labels' amended complaint, which alleges that Udio used the YT-DLP tool to bypass YouTube's rolling-cipher encryption and download sound recordings for training, in violation of 17 U.S.C. 1201(a). Udio argued the cipher is a copy control, whose circumvention the statute does not prohibit, rather than an access control. The court explained that Section 1201(a)(1) bars circumventing access controls but not copy controls, and that a measure may serve as both. It held that, accepting the complaint's allegations, the labels plausibly pleaded that YouTube uses technological measures regulating access to its content and that Udio circumvented them, but that whether the measures are access controls within the statute 'requires a greater factual record,' so Udio may renew the argument later. The court noted that the Second Circuit appeal in Yout v. RIAA raises related questions and said it would apply current law. The order was issued after UMG and Warner had settled and left the case.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.