You’re signed up for e-mail updates.
Judge splits authors' suit against six AI companies: case goes on against Anthropic alone, and Google, xAI, Perplexity, Apple and NVIDIA are severed
Judge P. Casey Pitts granted the defendants' motions to sever. He found the plaintiffs had not met Rule 20's same-transaction requirement: an allegation that several companies copied the same works, or even a reasonable inference that each used Anna's Archive, does not tie the defendants together without allegations of concerted action, and the order notes the companies are business rivals. The court said it would sever under Rule 21 even if joinder were proper, and denied the plaintiffs' request for consolidation. Google, xAI, Perplexity, Apple and NVIDIA were severed and dismissed from the case, which goes forward against Anthropic, the first-named defendant. The order addresses only how the case is structured; it does not decide whether any company copied the plaintiffs' books.
Loading the rest of the news…
What the labels mean
Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.
This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.