PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

Court rulingAugust 18, 2026UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc. · D. Mass., No. 1:24-cv-11611-FDS (Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV)

Judge Saylor lets the labels add a DMCA claim that Suno bypassed YouTube's rolling cipher to rip training audio, but refuses to add 61,026 more recordings to the case

In two orders on Aug. 18, 2026, Judge Saylor granted the record companies' first motion to amend and denied their second. The first order recounts that in May 2025 Suno answered an interrogatory by saying it downloaded audio files from YouTube using open-source tools such as YT-DL and YT-DLP. The labels then sought to add a claim under 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(1). Suno argued YouTube's rolling cipher only inhibits copying and does not control access, so bypassing it is not actionable. The court held the proposed claim is plausible: a measure can effectively control access even if users can view the work through the authorized player, the DVD-encryption cases show as much, and how YouTube's cipher and the ripping tools actually work 'require further factual development.' The second order denied leave to assert 61,026 additional recordings identified in discovery, finding that adding them a month before the close of fact discovery would delay the case indefinitely and prejudice Suno, which is entitled to a timely ruling on fair use; the court suggested a separate related suit and said parallel cases best balance the interests. The denial was without prejudice.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.