PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

AllegationSeptember 29, 2026In re OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation (New York Times v. Microsoft) · S.D.N.Y., No. 1:25-md-03143 (MDL)

Bloomberg Industry Group asks to intervene in the New York Times case to unseal the Times' proposed third amended complaint and its exhibits; the publishers do not object, Microsoft opposes

On Sept. 29, 2026, Bloomberg Industry Group moved under Rule 24(b) to intervene for the limited purpose of unsealing the redactions in the New York Times' proposed Third Amended Complaint (filed June 25, 2026 with a cross-motion to add contributory-infringement theories against Microsoft) and the 15 sealed exhibits supporting it, and to take part in the sealing motions on the summary-judgment record. Its brief says Judge Stein denied the Times' cross-motion on Aug. 6, 2026 while citing the redacted paragraphs, so the public "cannot fully assess" the record behind that ruling; that OpenAI's July 2, 2026 sealing motion offered only general reasons (contract prices with Microsoft, workstream dashboards and model details); and that no document-by-document findings were made. It notes an omnibus sealing motion on the summary-judgment exhibits is not due until Jan. 13, 2027. On Oct. 16, the News plaintiffs filed a one-line response saying they do not object (Dkt. 2107). The docket shows Microsoft filed an opposition the same day (Dkt. 2109), which was not available on RECAP when this was written. The motion is a non-party's request; the court has not ruled.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.