You’re signed up for e-mail updates.
ROSS Intelligence asks the Third Circuit for more time, to Nov. 3, to seek rehearing en banc of the ruling that its AI training was not fair use
In an unopposed motion filed Oct. 7, ROSS Intelligence asked the Third Circuit for 21 more days, to Nov. 3, 2026, to file a petition for rehearing en banc of the court's Sept. 29 decision that its use of Westlaw headnotes to train a legal research tool was not fair use. Without an extension the petition is due Oct. 13. ROSS says the opinion is "the first appellate case to address" whether AI training on copyrighted works is fair use, and that the case raises complex copyright issues. Thomson Reuters does not oppose the extension. The court had not ruled on the request when we checked. The motion is ROSS's own statement of its plans; no petition has been filed yet.
Loading the rest of the news…
What the labels mean
Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.
This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.