PayAuthorscom

News

AI copyright news, graded by source

Court rulings, company filings and allegations in the copyright cases against AI companies and pirate libraries, over books, articles, music, images, video and code. Checked for new filings every three hours; items are posted after review, so some appear later. Get these by e-mail · Court filings, free to read

Each item is graded by its source: a court’s ruling or order; a company’s own filing about itself; a defendant’s filing arguing its side; a plaintiffs’ filing; the claims in a complaint (allegation); or press reporting.

Get these updates by e-mail

For all news.

How the e-mails work

Uses the search, kind and company you set above (not the month or sort). As we post means within about 15 minutes of a new item; digests go out in the morning, U.S. Central time, weekly on Mondays, and only when something new matches. Updates start right away, and every e-mail has a one-click unsubscribe. If you tick Catch me up, the earlier items that match also come two a day, oldest first, each morning until you are up to date; you can stop that alone from any e-mail. Someone you invite gets one e-mail asking them to accept, and nothing more unless they do; we don’t tell them who invited them. Privacy.

AllegationOctober 12, 2026EVOX Productions v. Stability AI, Runway AI, Hugging Face and DeviantArt · C.D. Cal., No. 2:26-cv-07201

Stability AI, Runway and DeviantArt move to dismiss EVOX's car-photo suit, arguing training was fair use, the claims are too late and the outputs copy only a photographic 'look'

In three motions filed Oct. 12, 2026, the Stability AI entities, Runway AI and DeviantArt ask the court to dismiss EVOX Productions' claims over about 104,000 licensed car photographs that EVOX says were in the LAION datasets used to train Stable Diffusion. Stability argues that training a general-purpose image model on the photos was fair use as a matter of law; that the training claim is time-barred because Stable Diffusion and the LAION datasets were public by October 2022, over three years before the July 2026 complaint; that the output claim seeks to protect a photographic "look" (white backgrounds, camera height, lighting) rather than expression; that users, not Stability, generate the outputs; that the contributory claim fails under the Supreme Court's Cox v. Sony intent standard; and that under the Ninth Circuit's Doe v. GitHub a new image lacking EVOX's watermark is not a removal of copyright management information. Runway and DeviantArt make similar arguments and add that they did not train the model; DeviantArt says its DreamUp service only used the pre-trained model. Hearing noticed for Jan. 11, 2027. These are the defendants' arguments; the court has not ruled.

Loading the rest of the news…

What the labels mean

Every item says what kind of source it rests on. A court ruling or order is the court's own statement. A company filing is what a defendant says about itself. A government filing is a statement by a government agency that is not a party to the case, such as a statement of interest; it is the government's position, not a ruling. An allegation is what a complaint or motion claims and has not been decided. Reported means press reporting we have not confirmed from the primary document. Summaries are our own; follow the links for the source.

This page is general information, not legal advice. An allegation is not a finding. Whether any of this matters for a particular work or claim is a question for a lawyer.